October CMS vs WBCE CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
VS
WBCE CMS
Community-driven PHP CMS forked from WebsiteBaker
| Feature | October CMS | WBCE CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,140 | ★ 45 |
| First released | 2014 | 2015 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Choose WBCE CMS if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is October CMS or WBCE CMS better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while WBCE CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are October CMS and WBCE CMS free and open-source?
Yes. October CMS is licensed under MIT and WBCE CMS under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run October CMS and WBCE CMS with Docker?
October CMS: yes. WBCE CMS: check the project docs for container support.