October CMS vs Pico
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
VS
Pico
Stupidly simple flat-file CMS
| Feature | October CMS | Pico |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,140 | ★ 3,904 |
| First released | 2014 | 2012 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Frequently asked questions
Is October CMS or Pico better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community, while Pico is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are October CMS and Pico free and open-source?
Yes. October CMS is licensed under MIT and Pico under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run October CMS and Pico with Docker?
October CMS: yes. Pico: yes.