NPS vs Pi-hole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNPSPi-hole
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0EUPL-1.2
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 34,157★ 60,247
First released20192026
Replacesngrok

Why pick each one

Choose NPS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
NPS details

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
Pi-hole details

Frequently asked questions

Is NPS or Pi-hole better?

Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are NPS and Pi-hole free and open-source?

Yes. NPS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NPS and Pi-hole with Docker?

NPS: yes. Pi-hole: yes.

Related comparisons