acme.sh vs NPS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shNPS
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 34,157
First released20162019
ReplacesCertbotngrok

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose NPS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
NPS details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or NPS better?

acme.sh is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider NPS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are acme.sh and NPS free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and NPS with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. NPS: yes.

Related comparisons