AdGuard Home vs Pi-hole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAdGuard HomePi-hole
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0EUPL-1.2
LanguageTypeScriptShell
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,977★ 60,247
First released20182026
ReplacesPi-hole, NextDNS

Why pick each one

Choose AdGuard Home if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
AdGuard Home details

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Released under the EUPL-1.2 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 60.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
Pi-hole details

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuard Home or Pi-hole better?

Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community, while AdGuard Home is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are AdGuard Home and Pi-hole free and open-source?

Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AdGuard Home and Pi-hole with Docker?

AdGuard Home: yes. Pi-hole: yes.

Related comparisons