ctrld vs Pi-hole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturectrldPi-hole
Deploy effortRead-the-docs project≈5-minute setup
Health score82 · Excellent100 · Excellent
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITEUPL-1.2
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 899★ 61,045
First released20222015
ReplacesNextDNSNextDNS

What are ctrld and Pi-hole?

ctrld

ctrld is an open-source DNS forwarding proxy from Control D that supports DNS-over-HTTPS, custom routing and per-client policies. It is self-hosted as a single binary on routers and servers.

  • Encrypted DNS forwarding
  • Per-client policies
  • Custom routing
  • Single binary

Pi-hole

Pi-hole is a network-wide ad and tracker blocker that acts as a DNS sinkhole with a web dashboard for monitoring and management. It targets home users who want blocking on every device without client software. It is deployed via Docker or an install script.

  • DNS-level ad blocking
  • Query log and statistics
  • Optional DHCP server
  • Group-based client rules

Read the full Pi-hole guide →

ctrld vs Pi-hole: key differences

Ctrld is written in Go, while Pi-hole is built with Shell. Licensing differs — MIT for ctrld versus EUPL-1.2 for Pi-hole. Ctrld is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Pi-hole. Pi-hole is the more established project (first released 2015), while ctrld arrived in 2022. Pi-hole has the considerably larger community, at 61,045 GitHub stars versus 899. Pi-hole lists first-class Docker deployment; ctrld does not.

Why pick each one

Choose ctrld if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
ctrld details

Choose Pi-hole if…

  • Network-wide ad blocking
  • Polished web dashboard
  • Runs on Raspberry Pi

Watch out for

  • Can break some sites
  • Whitelist maintenance needed
Pi-hole details

Frequently asked questions

Is ctrld or Pi-hole better?

Neither is universally better. Pi-hole has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are ctrld and Pi-hole free and open-source?

Yes. ctrld is licensed under MIT and Pi-hole under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ctrld and Pi-hole with Docker?

ctrld: check the project docs for container support. Pi-hole: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, ctrld or Pi-hole?

ctrld has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Pi-hole. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons