node-oidc-provider vs Supabase Auth
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | node-oidc-provider | Supabase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 88 · Excellent | 87 · Excellent |
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,816 | ★ 2,569 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Okta | Auth0 |
What are node-oidc-provider and Supabase Auth?
node-oidc-provider
node-oidc-provider is an open-source, certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider implementation for Node.js. It can be self-hosted to issue tokens and act as an identity provider for applications.
- Certified OIDC provider
- OAuth 2.0 support
- Embeddable in Node apps
- Standards compliant
Supabase Auth
GoTrue is a lightweight JSON Web Token based authentication API for managing users and sessions, originally from Netlify and extended by Supabase. It is self-hosted as a small Go service.
- JWT-based auth API
- Email and OAuth login
- Lightweight Go service
- Self-hostable
node-oidc-provider vs Supabase Auth: key differences
Node-oidc-provider is written in JavaScript, while Supabase Auth is built with Go. Supabase Auth is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for node-oidc-provider.
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Supabase Auth if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is node-oidc-provider or Supabase Auth better?
Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while Supabase Auth is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are node-oidc-provider and Supabase Auth free and open-source?
Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and Supabase Auth under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run node-oidc-provider and Supabase Auth with Docker?
node-oidc-provider: yes. Supabase Auth: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, node-oidc-provider or Supabase Auth?
Supabase Auth has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for node-oidc-provider. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.