node-oidc-provider vs Supabase Auth
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
VS
Supabase Auth
Small JWT-based user authentication API service
| Feature | node-oidc-provider | Supabase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,788 | ★ 2,513 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Okta | Auth0 |
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Supabase Auth if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is node-oidc-provider or Supabase Auth better?
Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while Supabase Auth is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are node-oidc-provider and Supabase Auth free and open-source?
Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and Supabase Auth under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run node-oidc-provider and Supabase Auth with Docker?
node-oidc-provider: yes. Supabase Auth: yes.