node-oidc-provider vs OpenUnison
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
VS
OpenUnison
Identity management and SSO portal for Kubernetes
| Feature | node-oidc-provider | OpenUnison |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Less |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,788 | ★ 136 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Okta | Okta |
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose OpenUnison if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Less
Frequently asked questions
Is node-oidc-provider or OpenUnison better?
Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are node-oidc-provider and OpenUnison free and open-source?
Yes. node-oidc-provider is licensed under MIT and OpenUnison under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run node-oidc-provider and OpenUnison with Docker?
node-oidc-provider: yes. OpenUnison: check the project docs for container support.