Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs elFinder
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Nextcloud Desktop Sync | elFinder |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 88 · Excellent | 87 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | C++ | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,872 | ★ 4,804 |
| First released | 2016 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, OneDrive | Google Drive, Dropbox |
What are Nextcloud Desktop Sync and elFinder?
Nextcloud Desktop Sync
The Nextcloud desktop client keeps files synchronized between your computer and a Nextcloud server, with selective sync and virtual files support. It is the primary way to sync folders from desktop platforms.
- Folder synchronization
- Selective sync
- Virtual files support
- Cross-platform
elFinder
elFinder is an open-source web file manager with a user interface inspired by the macOS Finder. It supports multiple storage backends, drag and drop, and image editing.
- macOS Finder-style UI
- Multiple storage backends
- Built-in image editor
Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs elFinder: key differences
Nextcloud Desktop Sync is written in C++, while elFinder is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for Nextcloud Desktop Sync versus BSD-3-Clause for elFinder. ElFinder is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Nextcloud Desktop Sync. ElFinder is the more established project (first released 2010), while Nextcloud Desktop Sync arrived in 2016.
Why pick each one
Choose Nextcloud Desktop Sync if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Choose elFinder if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Nextcloud Desktop Sync or elFinder better?
Neither is universally better. elFinder has the larger community, while Nextcloud Desktop Sync is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Nextcloud Desktop Sync and elFinder free and open-source?
Yes. Nextcloud Desktop Sync is licensed under GPL-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Nextcloud Desktop Sync and elFinder with Docker?
Nextcloud Desktop Sync: check the project docs for container support. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Nextcloud Desktop Sync or elFinder?
elFinder has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Nextcloud Desktop Sync. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- elFinder vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- elFinder vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs copyparty
- elFinder vs copyparty
- Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs Dufs
- elFinder vs Dufs
- Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs File Browser
- elFinder vs File Browser