OpenCloud Files vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenCloud FilesSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,083★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose OpenCloud Files if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
OpenCloud Files details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCloud Files or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while OpenCloud Files is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are OpenCloud Files and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. OpenCloud Files is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenCloud Files and SeaweedFS with Docker?

OpenCloud Files: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons