OpenCloud Files vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenCloud FilesPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,083★ 43,003
First released20202026
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose OpenCloud Files if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
OpenCloud Files details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCloud Files or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenCloud Files and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. OpenCloud Files is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenCloud Files and Puter with Docker?

OpenCloud Files: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons