Nextcloud All-in-One vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNextcloud All-in-OneSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,238★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Nextcloud All-in-One if…

  • Much simpler than manual setup
  • Backup and update built in
  • Officially supported
Nextcloud All-in-One details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nextcloud All-in-One or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Nextcloud All-in-One is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nextcloud All-in-One and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Nextcloud All-in-One is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nextcloud All-in-One and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Nextcloud All-in-One: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons