Stringer vs rsspls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
rsspls
Generate RSS feeds for websites that lack them
| Feature | Stringer | rsspls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 411 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose rsspls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or rsspls better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community, while rsspls is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Stringer and rsspls free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and rsspls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and rsspls with Docker?
Stringer: yes. rsspls: check the project docs for container support.