FeedMixer vs Stringer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FeedMixer
Aggregate multiple feeds into one combined RSS feed
VS
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
| Feature | FeedMixer | Stringer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 237 | ★ 4,122 |
| First released | 2017 | 2013 |
| Replaces | RSS Mix, Feedly | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose FeedMixer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FeedMixer or Stringer better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community, while FeedMixer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FeedMixer and Stringer free and open-source?
Yes. FeedMixer is licensed under MIT and Stringer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FeedMixer and Stringer with Docker?
FeedMixer: check the project docs for container support. Stringer: yes.