FeedMixer vs Miniflux
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FeedMixer
Aggregate multiple feeds into one combined RSS feed
VS
Miniflux
Minimalist and opinionated RSS feed reader
| Feature | FeedMixer | Miniflux |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 237 | ★ 9,561 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | RSS Mix, Feedly | Feedly, Inoreader |
Why pick each one
Choose FeedMixer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FeedMixer or Miniflux better?
Neither is universally better. Miniflux has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FeedMixer and Miniflux free and open-source?
Yes. FeedMixer is licensed under MIT and Miniflux under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FeedMixer and Miniflux with Docker?
FeedMixer: check the project docs for container support. Miniflux: yes.