Feedpushr vs Stringer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Feedpushr
Powerful RSS aggregator, able to transform and send articles to many
VS
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
| Feature | Feedpushr | Stringer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 389 | ★ 4,122 |
| First released | 2025 | 2013 |
| Replaces | — | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Feedpushr if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Feedpushr or Stringer better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Feedpushr and Stringer free and open-source?
Yes. Feedpushr is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Stringer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feedpushr and Stringer with Docker?
Feedpushr: yes. Stringer: yes.