Stringer vs Feed mixer nono Granary
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stringer
Anti-social, self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Feed mixer nono Granary
Convert between feed formats and social network data
| Feature | Stringer | Feed mixer nono Granary |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | Public-Domain |
| Language | Ruby | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,122 | ★ 516 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Feed mixer nono Granary if…
- Released under the Public-Domain license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Stringer or Feed mixer nono Granary better?
Neither is universally better. Stringer has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stringer and Feed mixer nono Granary free and open-source?
Yes. Stringer is licensed under MIT and Feed mixer nono Granary under Public-Domain. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stringer and Feed mixer nono Granary with Docker?
Stringer: yes. Feed mixer nono Granary: yes.