FeedHQ vs Tinyfeed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FeedHQ
Web-based feed reader with Google Reader API support
VS
Tinyfeed
Generate a static HTML page from a collection of feeds
| Feature | FeedHQ | Tinyfeed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | E-books & Media Library |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 579 | ★ 373 |
| First released | 2012 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Google Reader, Feedly | Feedly, Google Reader, Netvibes |
Why pick each one
Choose FeedHQ if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Tinyfeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FeedHQ or Tinyfeed better?
Neither is universally better. FeedHQ has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FeedHQ and Tinyfeed free and open-source?
Yes. FeedHQ is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Tinyfeed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FeedHQ and Tinyfeed with Docker?
FeedHQ: yes. Tinyfeed: check the project docs for container support.