CommaFeed vs Tinyfeed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CommaFeed
Google Reader-inspired self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Tinyfeed
Generate a static HTML page from a collection of feeds
| Feature | CommaFeed | Tinyfeed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | E-books & Media Library |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,579 | ★ 373 |
| First released | 2013 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly, Google Reader, Netvibes |
Why pick each one
Choose Tinyfeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is CommaFeed or Tinyfeed better?
CommaFeed is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tinyfeed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are CommaFeed and Tinyfeed free and open-source?
Yes. CommaFeed is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tinyfeed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CommaFeed and Tinyfeed with Docker?
CommaFeed: yes. Tinyfeed: check the project docs for container support.