FeedHQ vs selfoss
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FeedHQ
Web-based feed reader with Google Reader API support
VS
selfoss
Multipurpose RSS reader and web scraping aggregator
| Feature | FeedHQ | selfoss |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 579 | ★ 2,469 |
| First released | 2012 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Reader, Feedly | Google Reader, Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose FeedHQ if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose selfoss if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is FeedHQ or selfoss better?
selfoss is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FeedHQ if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FeedHQ and selfoss free and open-source?
Yes. FeedHQ is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and selfoss under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FeedHQ and selfoss with Docker?
FeedHQ: yes. selfoss: yes.