FeedHQ vs RSS reader nono Leed

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeedHQRSS reader nono Leed
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseCC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 579★ 233
First released20122012
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyGoogle Reader, Feedly

Why pick each one

Choose FeedHQ if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
FeedHQ details

Choose RSS reader nono Leed if…

  • Released under the CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
RSS reader nono Leed details

Frequently asked questions

Is FeedHQ or RSS reader nono Leed better?

Neither is universally better. FeedHQ has the larger community, while RSS reader nono Leed is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FeedHQ and RSS reader nono Leed free and open-source?

Yes. FeedHQ is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and RSS reader nono Leed under CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FeedHQ and RSS reader nono Leed with Docker?

FeedHQ: yes. RSS reader nono Leed: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons