SHSelfHostIndex

FeedHQ vs Feed dashboard nono Reader-self

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FE FeedHQ Web-based feed reader with Google Reader API support VS FE Feed dashboard nono Reader-self PHP RSS aggregator with a Google Reader API
FeatureFeedHQFeed dashboard nono Reader-self
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 579★ 153
First released20122013
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyGoogle Reader, Feedly

Why pick each one

Choose FeedHQ if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
FeedHQ details

Choose Feed dashboard nono Reader-self if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
Feed dashboard nono Reader-self details

Frequently asked questions

Is FeedHQ or Feed dashboard nono Reader-self better?

Neither is universally better. FeedHQ has the larger community, while Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FeedHQ and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self free and open-source?

Yes. FeedHQ is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FeedHQ and Feed dashboard nono Reader-self with Docker?

FeedHQ: yes. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self: yes.

Related comparisons