NetBird vs Pritunl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
NetBird
Connect devices into a secure WireGuard-based overlay network
VS
Pritunl
Enterprise VPN server built on OpenVPN and WireGuard
| Feature | NetBird | Pritunl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,139 | ★ 4,997 |
| First released | 2021 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Tailscale, ZeroTier | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose NetBird if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 28.1k GitHub stars
Choose Pritunl if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is NetBird or Pritunl better?
Neither is universally better. NetBird has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are NetBird and Pritunl free and open-source?
Yes. NetBird is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Pritunl under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run NetBird and Pritunl with Docker?
NetBird: yes. Pritunl: yes.