NetBird vs tunnelmole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNetBirdtunnelmole
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybinary, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 28,139★ 1,885
First released20212021
ReplacesTailscale, ZeroTierngrok, localtunnel

Why pick each one

Choose NetBird if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.1k GitHub stars
NetBird details

Choose tunnelmole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
tunnelmole details

Frequently asked questions

Is NetBird or tunnelmole better?

Neither is universally better. NetBird has the larger community, while tunnelmole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are NetBird and tunnelmole free and open-source?

Yes. NetBird is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and tunnelmole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NetBird and tunnelmole with Docker?

NetBird: yes. tunnelmole: yes.

Related comparisons