NeonLink vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
NeonLink
Bookmark service with unique design and simple installation with
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | NeonLink | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 407 | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2026 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose NeonLink if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is NeonLink or Floccus better?
Floccus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider NeonLink if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are NeonLink and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. NeonLink is licensed under MIT and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run NeonLink and Floccus with Docker?
NeonLink: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.