CameraView vs RtspToWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
VS
RtspToWeb
Restream RTSP camera feeds to web browsers
| Feature | CameraView | RtspToWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Java | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,128 | ★ 1,689 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Proprietary camera SDKs | go2rtc |
Why pick each one
Choose RtspToWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is CameraView or RtspToWeb better?
Neither is universally better. CameraView has the larger community, while RtspToWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CameraView and RtspToWeb free and open-source?
Yes. CameraView is licensed under MIT and RtspToWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CameraView and RtspToWeb with Docker?
CameraView: check the project docs for container support. RtspToWeb: yes.