Naemon vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNaemonUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageCJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 170★ 89,960
First released20142021
ReplacesSolarWinds, PRTGPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Naemon if…

  • Faster than classic Nagios
  • Reuses Nagios plugins
Naemon details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Naemon or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Naemon if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Naemon and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Naemon is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Naemon and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Naemon: check the project docs for container support. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons