Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Zwave-JS Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Mozilla WebThings Gateway | Zwave-JS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 81 · Excellent | 74 · Good |
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,646 | ★ 164 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | SmartThings, Google Home | SmartThings |
What are Mozilla WebThings Gateway and Zwave-JS Server?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway
WebThings Gateway is an open-source gateway for monitoring and controlling smart home devices over the web using open standards. Originating at Mozilla, it now continues as a community project.
- Web of Things standards
- Add-on device support
- Rules engine
- Local web interface
Zwave-JS Server
Z-Wave JS Server is a small server that exposes the Z-Wave JS driver over a WebSocket API. It allows multiple clients, such as Home Assistant, to control a Z-Wave network simultaneously.
- WebSocket Z-Wave API
- Multi-client support
- Built on Z-Wave JS
- Lightweight server
Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Zwave-JS Server: key differences
Both projects are written in TypeScript. Licensing differs — MPL-2.0 for Mozilla WebThings Gateway versus Apache-2.0 for Zwave-JS Server. Zwave-JS Server is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Mozilla WebThings Gateway. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is the more established project (first released 2018), while Zwave-JS Server arrived in 2021. Mozilla WebThings Gateway has the considerably larger community, at 2,646 GitHub stars versus 164.
Why pick each one
Choose Mozilla WebThings Gateway if…
- Open standards-based
- Privacy-focused
Watch out for
- Smaller community after Mozilla
- Fewer integrations than HA
Choose Zwave-JS Server if…
- Decouples driver from clients
- Reliable
Watch out for
- Headless, no UI
- Z-Wave only
Frequently asked questions
Is Mozilla WebThings Gateway or Zwave-JS Server better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla WebThings Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mozilla WebThings Gateway and Zwave-JS Server free and open-source?
Yes. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Zwave-JS Server under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mozilla WebThings Gateway and Zwave-JS Server with Docker?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway: yes. Zwave-JS Server: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Mozilla WebThings Gateway or Zwave-JS Server?
Zwave-JS Server has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Mozilla WebThings Gateway. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs AppDaemon
- Zwave-JS Server vs AppDaemon
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Domoticz
- Zwave-JS Server vs Domoticz
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs ESPHome
- Zwave-JS Server vs ESPHome
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs evcc
- Zwave-JS Server vs evcc
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs FHEM
- Zwave-JS Server vs FHEM