ESPHome vs Zwave-JS Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ESPHome
Configure ESP devices with simple YAML
VS
Zwave-JS Server
Small server wrapping the Z-Wave JS driver over WebSocket
| Feature | ESPHome | Zwave-JS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,505 | ★ 162 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | SmartThings | SmartThings |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is ESPHome or Zwave-JS Server better?
Neither is universally better. ESPHome has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ESPHome and Zwave-JS Server free and open-source?
Yes. ESPHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Zwave-JS Server under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ESPHome and Zwave-JS Server with Docker?
ESPHome: yes. Zwave-JS Server: yes.
Related comparisons
- ESPHome vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- Zwave-JS Server vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- ESPHome vs Domoticz
- Zwave-JS Server vs Domoticz
- ESPHome vs OpenMQTTGateway
- ESPHome vs Jeedom
- Zwave-JS Server vs Jeedom
- ESPHome vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway
- Zwave-JS Server vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway
- ESPHome vs EMQX
- Zwave-JS Server vs EMQX