motionEye vs CameraView
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
VS
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
| Feature | motionEye | CameraView |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,651 | ★ 5,128 |
| First released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Proprietary camera SDKs |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is motionEye or CameraView better?
Neither is universally better. CameraView has the larger community, while motionEye is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are motionEye and CameraView free and open-source?
Yes. motionEye is licensed under GPL-3.0 and CameraView under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run motionEye and CameraView with Docker?
motionEye: yes. CameraView: check the project docs for container support.