Mopidy vs Tempo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mopidy
Extensible music server that plays from many sources
VS
Tempo
Material You Subsonic music client for Android
| Feature | Mopidy | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,553 | ★ 2,220 |
| First released | 2010 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Spotify, Plexamp |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Mopidy or Tempo better?
Neither is universally better. Mopidy has the larger community, while Tempo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Mopidy and Tempo free and open-source?
Yes. Mopidy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tempo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mopidy and Tempo with Docker?
Mopidy: yes. Tempo: check the project docs for container support.