Hertzbeat vs Zabbix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hertzbeat
Real-time monitoring system with customizable templates
VS
Zabbix
Enterprise-grade open-source monitoring solution
| Feature | Hertzbeat | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go Template |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,351 | ★ 6,228 |
| First released | 2022 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Zabbix, Datadog | Datadog, Nagios |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Hertzbeat or Zabbix better?
Hertzbeat is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Zabbix if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Hertzbeat and Zabbix free and open-source?
Yes. Hertzbeat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zabbix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hertzbeat and Zabbix with Docker?
Hertzbeat: yes. Zabbix: yes.