Glances vs Hertzbeat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesHertzbeat
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 7,351
First released20122022
ReplacesDatadogZabbix, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Hertzbeat if…

  • No agents to deploy
  • Flexible templates
Hertzbeat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Hertzbeat better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Hertzbeat if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and Hertzbeat free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Hertzbeat under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Hertzbeat with Docker?

Glances: yes. Hertzbeat: yes.

Related comparisons