Grafana vs Hertzbeat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanaHertzbeat
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 7,351
First released20142022
ReplacesDatadogZabbix, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose Hertzbeat if…

  • No agents to deploy
  • Flexible templates
Hertzbeat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Hertzbeat better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana and Hertzbeat free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Hertzbeat under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and Hertzbeat with Docker?

Grafana: yes. Hertzbeat: yes.

Related comparisons