Hertzbeat vs Uptrace
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hertzbeat
Real-time monitoring system with customizable templates
VS
Uptrace
OpenTelemetry-based tracing, metrics, and logs tool
| Feature | Hertzbeat | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSL-1.1 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,351 | ★ 4,256 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Zabbix, Datadog | Datadog, New Relic |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Hertzbeat or Uptrace better?
Neither is universally better. Hertzbeat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Hertzbeat and Uptrace free and open-source?
Yes. Hertzbeat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptrace under BSL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hertzbeat and Uptrace with Docker?
Hertzbeat: yes. Uptrace: yes.