Hertzbeat vs OpenObserve
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hertzbeat
Real-time monitoring system with customizable templates
VS
OpenObserve
Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics and traces
| Feature | Hertzbeat | OpenObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,351 | ★ 20,592 |
| First released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Zabbix, Datadog | Datadog, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenObserve if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 20.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Hertzbeat or OpenObserve better?
Neither is universally better. OpenObserve has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Hertzbeat and OpenObserve free and open-source?
Yes. Hertzbeat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenObserve under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hertzbeat and OpenObserve with Docker?
Hertzbeat: yes. OpenObserve: yes.