Grafana Beyla vs Grafana Tempo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grafana Beyla
Zero-code eBPF auto-instrumentation for application metrics
VS
Grafana Tempo
Easy-to-operate, high-scale distributed tracing backend
| Feature | Grafana Beyla | Grafana Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,083 | ★ 5,416 |
| First released | 2023 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Datadog APM, New Relic | Datadog APM |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Beyla or Grafana Tempo better?
Neither is universally better. Grafana Tempo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Grafana Beyla and Grafana Tempo free and open-source?
Yes. Grafana Beyla is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Tempo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grafana Beyla and Grafana Tempo with Docker?
Grafana Beyla: yes. Grafana Tempo: yes.