Glances vs Grafana Tempo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesGrafana Tempo
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 5,416
First released20122020
ReplacesDatadogDatadog APM

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Grafana Tempo if…

  • Very cost-effective
  • Simple operations
Grafana Tempo details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Grafana Tempo better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana Tempo if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and Grafana Tempo free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Grafana Tempo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Grafana Tempo with Docker?

Glances: yes. Grafana Tempo: yes.

Related comparisons