Grafana k6 vs Grafana Tempo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Grafana Tempo
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 5,416
First released20172020
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterDatadog APM

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Grafana Tempo if…

  • Very cost-effective
  • Simple operations
Grafana Tempo details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Grafana Tempo better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana k6 and Grafana Tempo free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Grafana Tempo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Grafana Tempo with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Grafana Tempo: yes.

Related comparisons