SHSelfHostIndex

mjpg-streamer vs motionEye

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MJ mjpg-streamer Stream JPEG frames from webcams over HTTP VS MO motionEye Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
Featuremjpg-streamermotionEye
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageCPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 3,246★ 4,651
First released20132013
ReplacesWebcam streaming servicesNest Cam

Why pick each one

Choose mjpg-streamer if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
mjpg-streamer details

Choose motionEye if…

  • Easy to set up
  • Great for DIY builds
motionEye details

Frequently asked questions

Is mjpg-streamer or motionEye better?

Neither is universally better. motionEye has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are mjpg-streamer and motionEye free and open-source?

Yes. mjpg-streamer is licensed under GPL-2.0 and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mjpg-streamer and motionEye with Docker?

mjpg-streamer: check the project docs for container support. motionEye: yes.

Related comparisons