Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Home Assistant Integration
Connects Frigate NVR detections into Home Assistant
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | Frigate Home Assistant Integration | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,224 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2021 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Cloud camera integrations | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Home Assistant Integration if…
- Tight Home Assistant integration
- Local and private
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Home Assistant Integration or motionEye better?
Neither is universally better. motionEye has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Frigate Home Assistant Integration and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Home Assistant Integration is licensed under MIT and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Home Assistant Integration and motionEye with Docker?
Frigate Home Assistant Integration: check the project docs for container support. motionEye: yes.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs WebRTC Camera
- motionEye vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Cameradar
- motionEye vs Cameradar
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs CompreFace
- motionEye vs CompreFace
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Double Take
- motionEye vs Double Take
- Frigate Home Assistant Integration vs Frigate Mobile Companion
- motionEye vs Frigate Mobile Companion