MeTube vs ytdl-sub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MeTube
Web UI for downloading video from YouTube and many sites
VS
ytdl-sub
Subscribe to and download media into a self-hosted media library
| Feature | MeTube | ytdl-sub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,359 | ★ 2,909 |
| First released | 2021 | 2022 |
| Replaces | YouTube Premium | YouTube Premium |
Why pick each one
Choose ytdl-sub if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is MeTube or ytdl-sub better?
MeTube is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ytdl-sub if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are MeTube and ytdl-sub free and open-source?
Yes. MeTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ytdl-sub under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MeTube and ytdl-sub with Docker?
MeTube: yes. ytdl-sub: yes.