MeTube vs TubeSync
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MeTube
Web UI for downloading video from YouTube and many sites
VS
TubeSync
Syncs online video channels into a local media library
| Feature | MeTube | TubeSync |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,359 | ★ 2,767 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | YouTube Premium | YouTube Premium |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is MeTube or TubeSync better?
Neither is universally better. MeTube has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are MeTube and TubeSync free and open-source?
Yes. MeTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TubeSync under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MeTube and TubeSync with Docker?
MeTube: yes. TubeSync: yes.