metasfresh vs OpenBoxes

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemetasfreshOpenBoxes
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseGPL-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageJavaGroovy
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM4,096 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 2,394★ 871
First released20152011
ReplacesSAP, NetSuiteSAP, NetSuite

Why pick each one

Choose metasfresh if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
metasfresh details

Choose OpenBoxes if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Groovy
OpenBoxes details

Frequently asked questions

Is metasfresh or OpenBoxes better?

Neither is universally better. metasfresh has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are metasfresh and OpenBoxes free and open-source?

Yes. metasfresh is licensed under GPL-2.0 and OpenBoxes under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run metasfresh and OpenBoxes with Docker?

metasfresh: yes. OpenBoxes: yes.

Related comparisons