Axelor vs OpenBoxes

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAxelorOpenBoxes
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageJavaGroovy
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM2,048 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 965★ 871
First released20142011
ReplacesSAP, OdooSAP, NetSuite

Why pick each one

Choose Axelor if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Java
Axelor details

Choose OpenBoxes if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Groovy
OpenBoxes details

Frequently asked questions

Is Axelor or OpenBoxes better?

Neither is universally better. Axelor has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Axelor and OpenBoxes free and open-source?

Yes. Axelor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenBoxes under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Axelor and OpenBoxes with Docker?

Axelor: yes. OpenBoxes: yes.

Related comparisons