Axelor vs frePPLe
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Axelor
Open-source ERP, CRM, and BPM platform
VS
frePPLe
Open-source ERP for accounting, sales and inventory
| Feature | Axelor | frePPLe |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 965 | ★ 714 |
| First released | 2014 | 2008 |
| Replaces | SAP, Odoo | SAP, Oracle SCM |
Why pick each one
Choose Axelor if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Choose frePPLe if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Axelor or frePPLe better?
Neither is universally better. Axelor has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Axelor and frePPLe free and open-source?
Yes. Axelor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and frePPLe under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Axelor and frePPLe with Docker?
Axelor: yes. frePPLe: yes.