Medama vs Pirsch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Pirsch
Privacy-friendly, cookie-free web analytics platform
| Feature | Medama | Pirsch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 1,027 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Pirsch better?
Neither is universally better. Pirsch has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Pirsch free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Pirsch under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Pirsch with Docker?
Medama: yes. Pirsch: yes.