GoAccess vs Medama
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
| Feature | GoAccess | Medama |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 636 |
| First released | 2010 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or Medama better?
Neither is universally better. GoAccess has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GoAccess and Medama free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Medama under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and Medama with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. Medama: yes.