Dozzle vs GoAccess
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
| Feature | Dozzle | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 20,762 |
| First released | 2018 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or GoAccess better?
Neither is universally better. GoAccess has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dozzle and GoAccess free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and GoAccess under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and GoAccess with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. GoAccess: yes.