Medama vs Superset
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Superset
Modern data exploration and visualization platform
| Feature | Medama | Superset |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 74,178 |
| First released | 2024 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Superset if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 74.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Superset better?
Neither is universally better. Superset has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Superset free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Superset under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Superset with Docker?
Medama: yes. Superset: check the project docs for container support.